President’s Rule in Manipur: A Constitutional Analysis for UPSC Aspirants

Understand President’s Rule in India under Article 356, its constitutional provisions, history, implications, and the 2025 imposition in Manipur.

President's Rule
President Rule in Manipur

Introduction

The imposition of President’s Rule in Manipur on February 13, 2025, marks a critical development in Indian governance. It comes in the wake of prolonged ethnic violence between the Meitei and Kuki communities, leading to a constitutional breakdown in the state. The resignation of Chief Minister N. Biren Singh prompted the Union Government to take direct control of the state administration.

For UPSC aspirants, understanding the concept of President’s Rule (Article 356) is essential, as it forms a key part of the Indian Polity and Governance syllabus. This article provides a detailed analysis of President’s Rule in India, its constitutional provisions, historical precedents, implications, and the current situation in Manipur.

Read DD News article on President’s Rule imposed in Manipur


Current Situation in Manipur: Why Was President’s Rule Imposed?

Background of the Manipur Crisis

Manipur has witnessed ethnic tensions for decades, but the situation escalated in May 2023, when violent clashes broke out between the Meitei majority and the Kuki tribal groups. Key reasons for the unrest include:

  1. Demand for ST Status by Meiteis: The Meitei community sought Scheduled Tribe (ST) status, which the Kuki tribes opposed, fearing loss of tribal rights.
  2. Illegal Immigration from Myanmar: The Myanmar crisis has led to an influx of Kuki-Chin refugees, further aggravating the demographic tensions.
  3. Drug Trafficking & Militancy: The presence of drug cartels and insurgent groups has worsened law and order.
  4. Lack of Trust in State Administration: There were allegations of bias in handling ethnic violence, leading to governance failure.

Trigger for President’s Rule

Despite multiple efforts by the state and central governments, including curfews, security reinforcements, and peace talks, the violence persisted. The final trigger was:

  • Resignation of CM N. Biren Singh
  • Breakdown of constitutional machinery due to political instability
  • Failure to restore law and order

As a result, the Governor recommended President’s Rule, and the Union Government invoked Article 356.


Understanding President’s Rule (Article 356 of the Constitution)

Constitutional Provision

President’s Rule in a state is imposed under Article 356 of the Indian Constitution, which states:

“If the President, on receipt of a report from the Governor of the State or otherwise, is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution, the President may assume to himself all or any of the functions of the Government of the State.”

Also read : Indian Migration to USA: Causes, Challenges, and Solutions

Grounds for Imposition

  1. Failure of Constitutional Machinery: If the elected government fails to function according to constitutional provisions.
  2. Governor’s Report: The Governor of the state sends a report to the President, recommending central rule.
  3. Breakdown of Law & Order: If internal disturbances, riots, or insurgencies paralyze governance.
  4. Refusal to Follow Union Directives: If a state government deliberately disobeys constitutional obligations or defies Union Government orders.
  5. Hung Assembly: If no party secures a majority after elections and no government can be formed.

Procedure for Imposing President’s Rule

  1. Governor’s Report: The Governor submits a report to the President detailing why the state government is dysfunctional.
  2. Presidential Proclamation: The President issues a proclamation imposing President’s Rule.
  3. Parliamentary Approval:
    • Must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within 2 months.
    • Once approved, it lasts for 6 months.
    • Can be extended for up to 3 years with parliamentary approval every 6 months.

Impact of President’s Rule on the State

  1. Dissolution or Suspension of the State Legislature:
    • The State Legislative Assembly may be dissolved or kept in suspended animation.
  2. Executive Power Vested in the Governor:
    • The Governor administers the state on behalf of the President.
    • The Union Government runs the state through bureaucrats.
  3. Parliament Exercises Legislative Powers:
    • The Parliament makes laws for the state.
    • The President may authorize ordinances if the state legislature is dissolved.

Historical Instances of President’s Rule in India

Since 1950, President’s Rule has been imposed more than 125 times. Some significant instances include:

1. First Use of Article 356 (1951 – Punjab)

  • Imposed on Punjab in 1951 when the Prakash Singh Kairon government lost majority.

2. Indira Gandhi’s Era (1970s-1980s)

  • Maximum misuse of Article 356 to dismiss state governments ruled by opposition parties.
  • 1977: Janata Government dismissed nine Congress-ruled states after coming to power.
  • 1984: Dismissal of Andhra Pradesh CM N. T. Rama Rao, later reinstated after protests.

3. Post-S.R. Bommai Judgment (1994 – Present)

  • 1992: Article 356 was used to dismiss the BJP government in Karnataka, leading to the landmark S.R. Bommai case.
  • 2016: Uttarakhand and Arunachal Pradesh saw President’s Rule revoked after judicial intervention.
  • 2019: Imposed in Jammu and Kashmir after Article 370 was abrogated.

Also read: Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India: A Detailed Analysis


S.R. Bommai Case (1994) – Landmark Judgment on Article 356

The Supreme Court’s ruling in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) established strict guidelines for imposing President’s Rule. Key takeaways:

  1. Judicial Review: Courts can review the imposition of President’s Rule.
  2. No Arbitrary Dismissals: The Union Government cannot use Article 356 for political reasons.
  3. Parliamentary Approval Mandatory: President’s Rule must be justified and debated in Parliament.
  4. State Government Must Get a Chance to Prove Majority: Before dismissing a government, floor test should be conducted.

Implications of President’s Rule in Manipur

Positive Outcomes

  1. Restoration of Law & Order: The central government’s direct intervention may bring stability.
  2. Neutral Administration: No political interference ensures fair decision-making.
  3. Stronger Security Measures: The Union Government can deploy additional forces to control violence.

Concerns & Criticisms

  1. Democratic Deficit: Suspension of an elected government is a blow to federalism.
  2. Potential Misuse by the Center: Opposition parties fear political motivations behind such decisions.
  3. Uncertainty for State Governance: Long-term President’s Rule creates policy paralysis.

Conclusion

The imposition of President’s Rule in Manipur highlights the challenges of governing conflict-ridden states. While it provides temporary stability, it also raises questions on federalism and governance.

For UPSC aspirants, understanding Article 356, its judicial interpretations, and historical misuse is crucial for answering Mains and Interview questions on Indian Polity. The case of Manipur serves as a real-time example of how constitutional provisions are applied in crises.


Key Takeaways for UPSC

Article 356: President’s Rule imposed when state machinery fails.
Parliamentary Approval Needed: President’s Rule lasts 6 months, extendable to 3 years.
S.R. Bommai Case (1994): Judicial review and floor test required.
Manipur Crisis (2025): Ethnic violence, law and order failure led to President’s Rule.
Impact: Improves stability but raises federalism concerns.

This article provides a comprehensive UPSC-level analysis, ensuring concept clarity and real-world application.

Join GovtJob MONK, the ultimate social network platform for government job aspirants! Connect with like-minded individuals, discuss strategies, and stay motivated. Access the Activity Page to engage with the community, and visit our Updates Page for the latest notifications and free study material. Need instant guidance? Try MonkGPT, our AI chat assistant, to help you with your preparation. Together, let’s achieve your dream job!

Aspirants preparing for UPSC, State PSC, and other competitive exams can use GovtJobMONK to access free study material, expert-written articles, and structured essay guides. Covering a wide range of topics, from governance and economy to ethics and current affairs, the content is designed to enhance analytical skills and answer-writing techniques. With well-researched insights, model essays, and exam-oriented resources, this platform helps candidates build a strong foundation and improve their performance in both prelims and mains. Stay updated with quality study material, all available for free, to streamline your exam preparation effectively.

5 thoughts on “President’s Rule in Manipur: A Constitutional Analysis for UPSC Aspirants

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *